Promiscuity accelerates ageing

ageing faster in promiscuous fruit fliesReproduction comes at a cost: animals that reproduce a lot age faster than animals that don’t. There is also a cost associated with sexual interaction itself, not just the resulting reproduction. Promiscuous female fruit flies age faster than their monogamous or celibate friends. This is partly because some of the proteins in male fly semen are toxic to females. But just living with males and not even mating is enough to shorten life span and impair fertility of female flies. So the presence of males alone is enough to hasten ageing in females.

A new study shows that the sex life of lady flies doesn’t just affect them, it also affects their children. The offspring of flies that only mated once lived longer and were at a lower risk of dying than the offspring of the flies that mated multiple times.

This study compared three groups of female flies. The first group mated once, then were housed away from males. The second group mated once, then were housed with neutered males who could still woo them but couldn’t perform the act. The third group were housed with fertile males so mated many times. Offspring were then collected from all three groups.

The offspring from the first group of monogamous mothers tended to live longer than offspring from the other groups. Offspring from the second group, whose mothers were housed with neutered males, were 27% more likely to die than the offspring of the mothers who had only mated once. The offspring from the promiscuous mothers in the third group were 15% more likely to die than offspring in the first group. These results are interesting because the effect was more pronounced in the offspring of the females that were housed with neutered males. Perhaps this is because the males were trying harder to mate and so were stressing the females more with their romantic interludes. This also happens in guppies – if female guppies are sexually harrassed, they produce daughters with smaller bodies and sons with smaller gonads.

This study questions the cost-benefit ratio of promiscuity. Throughout the animal kingdom many females choose to mate with multiple males. This is thought to pass better genes to offspring; at the cost of causing the mother to have a shorter life span. Overall this would be a net positive effect for that population. But if promiscuity is stressing the mother, maybe it is actually causing a net negative effect?

In a separate study, female flies that mated with monogamous males didn’t suffer as much life span reduction as females who mated with promiscuous males. Males that were forced to be monogamous evolved over 47 generations to harm their mates less, and monogamous females evolved to be less resistant to harming. Monogamous flies also produced more offspring than promiscuous matings.

These two studies suggest that the promiscuity that is almost ubiquitous in the animal world may not have quite the evolutionary benefits we once thought.

The Scientific Papers
Dowling et al. Maternal sexual interactions affect offspring survival and ageing. J. Evol. Biol. 2014
Chapman et al. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature. 1995
Partridge and Fowler. Non-mating costs of exposure to males in female Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect. Physiol. 1990 
Holland and Rice. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductivce load. PNAS. 1999

2 thoughts on “Promiscuity accelerates ageing

Add yours

  1. This is interesting, Leah, and thanks for sharing it. Since evolution tends towards the most fit of each generation surviving, and since these results suggest that promiscuity is not the most beneficial either for females or for fruit flies, guppies, and supposedly other species, it causes me to question the results. First, did the researchers try and duplicate their own results, or is this just one long, large project that got written up? Second, is there something in the wild that is not found under laboratory conditions that pressures fruit flies and guppies to maintain promiscuity as the preferred mating strategy? The first thing that came to my mind was that in the wild fruit flies are under constant pressure from predators and (I think — I may be wrong) plant defenses. Would these pressures cause fruit flies to maintain promiscuity as the preferred means of passing genes on to the next generation? Is this testable under controlled conditions?

    1. I think the biggest main difference between the lab setting and the wild is that in the wild animals aren’t forced to live together in small vials. They are likely to just mate and then move on to feed etc. So I think the ongoing exposure to pheromones is somewhat artificial. Also longevity is not a trait that is selected for because most animals will reproduce quite early in their lives. So the fact that offspring from promiscuous mothers don’t live as long actually doesn’t affect the population. It does obviously affect the individual animals.

Let me know what you think

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: